Home / Latest News / Industry Insights

On the Ballot Today: Who Pays for the Data Center’s Power

Nov 03, 2026

Americans are voting today, and for the first time electricity bills are a genuine national campaign issue. Data centers are at the center of it. A September poll found 53% of Americans are extremely or very concerned about data centers’ effect on their electricity prices or water supplies. That is not a niche infrastructure debate. That is a majority.

The concern has numbers behind it. Researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas estimate that existing data centers have already raised average wholesale electricity prices by 2% to 6% nationally, with larger effects where facilities cluster. Their middle-range scenario projects generation costs 20% to 30% higher by 2028 than they would be without new data centers, partly because new power plants can take more than five years to connect to the grid

Congress agrees on the question, not the answer

In September, the House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act 417 to 3. The bill would have required state regulators to consider making data centers and other large users pay for the grid infrastructure built to serve them. On September 30, the Senate vote failed 57 to 43, short of the 60 needed to advance.

The reasons for the split are worth reading carefully. Supporters, mostly Republicans joined by four Democrats, argued the bill would ease pressure on household bills. Most Senate Democrats opposed it because they thought it did not go far enough: Chuck Schumer called it “toothless” and argued for a version that would require, rather than encourage, data centers to cover their infrastructure costs. Some critics also saw the timing as a pre-election play.

Set the politics aside and a rare point of agreement remains. Almost no one in that debate argued that households should subsidize the grid upgrades large data centers require. The argument was about enforcement. That consensus is likely to survive today’s results regardless of who wins, and the next version of this bill, in Congress or in statehouses, will probably be stricter rather than softer.

The cost allocation fight assumes a grid connection

Every version of this policy debate shares one assumption: that the data center plugs into the utility system, and the only question is how the resulting costs get divided. New transmission, new substations and new generation get built for the load, and regulators then decide who carries the bill.

That assumption is what makes the problem hard. A gigawatt-scale campus connecting to a regional grid triggers upgrades that ripple through the rate base for decades. Even well-designed tariffs end up arguing over the edges of shared infrastructure that serves everyone and therefore belongs to no one in particular. And while that argument plays out, the interconnection queue keeps the campus waiting years for power it needed yesterday.

Self-supplied power takes the question off the table

Next Century-Power builds dedicated, on-site generation for large data centers. Phase 1 is an islanded gas turbine microgrid at 1GW and above, sized for a single tenant and engineered for four-nines uptime with redundancy built in. Phase 2 transitions the same site to a 1.2GW pod of four 300MW Small Modular Reactors for durable, cost-stable baseload. Because the power plant serves the campus directly, the data center is not adding gigawatts of demand to a regional system and asking ratepayers to absorb the upgrades.

That changes the economics on both sides of the fence. The operator gets power on a construction timeline instead of a queue timeline, under a 10-year-plus contract with predictable pricing. The surrounding community gets a large industrial neighbor that pays its own way, plus on-site water treatment and a community investment fund. On-site carbon capture turns emissions into high-value 2D materials, so speed does not come at the expense of net-zero commitments.

Whatever the vote count tonight, the direction of policy is already set. Data centers will be expected to pay for the power they use and the infrastructure it requires. The operators who planned for that from the beginning will spend the next few years building. The rest will spend them in rate cases.

Categories

Recent Posts

Newsletter

Get weekly insights delivered to your inbox.